<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Urbnlivn - Latest Comments in Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://urbnlivn.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:25:16 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-7304883</link><description>Good Luck with condo flipping. Just wonder what happened to this one?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">OrientPoker</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:25:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243946</link><description>I to have dealt with David Gintz personally as well, and he is  a total con man. He runs his business with his brothers who are ALL con men and idiots to boot. I would not trust him at all even if my life depended on it. He was with Metropolitan Development Group , and they broke off without him because he was a scammer. Not that MDG is any better, Gwen and Casey are a bunch of low lives as well. Crappy employers and even crappier parents. I don't trust any of them .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Janis</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:01:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243945</link><description>Given Mr. Gintz's checkered personal past (first-hand experience/knowledge), I would strongly advise you not to deal with this con man.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Andy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:17:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243944</link><description>WOW! What a bunch of winers. Has anyone ever thought of making a suggestion directly to the Gintz Group? Has anyone ever thought about the fact that there WERE heroin addicts living in the stairway. That they loved the history of the building so much they tried to salvage as much as they could. I agree that the first round of colors were a little abrasive. To that end you talked they listended, the colors changed. They are people.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lola</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 19:58:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243943</link><description>OH RIGHT, re-paint the building SHIT_BROWN... Who are these people?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 18:30:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243942</link><description>Paint is happening again, this time with early 70's earth tones.  Better color combo, wrong decade.  Agree that the windows are the weak point in this renovation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Doug</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:22:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243941</link><description>Someone on the original post mentioned something about how this used to be a nice building until they painted it... Had they ever seen it?  Before it was really ugly and beige, with some weird King Arthur's court faux stained glass window next to the front door.  (Seattle buildings also seem to hate any color besides brown and beige, but that's another story.)  Now it's atrocious but at least it is interesting.  There's a bunch of those ugly 60s buildings in gray and beige, and the architecture is so boring and ugly, all you can really do to spruce it up is color.  personally, I think the new paint job is an improvement over the old building.  (Admittedly, I might have made the colors a bit more subtle, and maybe only used two or three colors.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Just my two cents.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243940</link><description>Vertigo?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here's a taste of Tacoma's Hitchcock pic...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gintz Group negotiated shared ownership of the Fawcett House in Tacoma with Fawcett House, LLC.  Another rescue operation?&lt;br&gt;  &lt;br&gt;City Officials performed an inspection on this 100 year old building in July 2006, found code violations, and immediately kicked out all residents.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One local press release suggested that the Fawcett House would be razed to make way for student housing and parking for the expanding UW Tacoma.  Another press release implied that new ownership intended to remodel the structure.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Click this link to get a feel for what really happened in T-Town:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/6299309p-5493489c.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/story/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Incidentally, the Gintz Group is setting up an office across the street from City Hall in our fair city.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Opinions from our fair(er) city to the north?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Curious in Tacoma.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Eric</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric R. Bitten</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 22:18:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243939</link><description>Coming soon, to a condo near you, new paint!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I walked past there last night. They've added blothches of paint to the side of the building... it looks like they're planning to repaint the exterior of their (mostly) empty building. Perhaps they think it's all about paint chips? There appears to be some dark forest green in the vertiginous future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Celeste Tanner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 17:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243938</link><description>AWESOME! I think condo flipping just jumped the shark err couch! Sign me up!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ted</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 17:04:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243937</link><description>Dustin, you're an idiot. If Mr. Gintz were really trying to help your parents, he would have convinced them to sell their homes much earlier before they even reached foreclosure, so they could profit from the sell of their home.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Mr Gintz has done a lot of good, for a lot of people. My own parents were going to be forced out of thier home if it werent for him. With his assistance they were able to get out of the home with money in thier pockets. Instead of getting kicked out by the bank."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Umm, if you seriously take a look, your parents were forced out of their home by Mr. Gintz while he took a serious profit from your parents unfortunate situation. He probably just gave your parents a cut from the profit he made so that your parents would have the illusion that they actually came out of the situation with something good. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Truthfully, if your parents had decided to sell their home before having to turn to Mr. Gintz for help, they would have walked away from the deal with a hell of a lot more money.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jeno</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 14:26:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243936</link><description>I admit that the building is ugly. You dont have to be a rocket scientist to figure that out. But that Lori Matsukawa article was an opinion filled witchhunt. What was left out of that article were most of the facts. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Such as the homeowners would have lost thier home months sooner if it wasn't for Mr Gintz. It also didnt mention that they neglected to pay on thier lease for many months before they were evicted. And they were evicted according to the law. What kind of landlord would let a tenant stay in a home where they dont make thier payments. Thats just proposterous. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mr Gintz has done a lot of good, for a lot of people. My own parents were going to be forced out of thier home if it werent for him. With his assistance they were able to get out of the home with money in thier pockets. Instead of getting kicked out by the bank. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If it wasnt for him, many other people would have been in the same boat, or actually living on the street with thier credit and in some cases thier lives ruined. So before you make up your mind, know that there are two sides to the story.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dustin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:11:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243935</link><description>It could be worse, look at the proliferation of "craftsman style townhomes" throughout Fremont, Wallingford etc. I get to walk past half a dozen or more on my mile walk to work.  I would much rather have some diversity, maybe a mid-century modern (not a pathetic attempt at copying one) and maybe some other interesting design attempts in their place.  Just my 2c</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">not_too_bad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:28:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243934</link><description>Ugh. I gag every time I leave for work and pass that place. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And how lame is it that the condo developers' minions would try to spam a blog?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wrp</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 20:49:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243933</link><description>Matt, just wanted to say thanks for this. Great stuff for potential buyers. Truly, much appreciated.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ethan John</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:57:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243932</link><description>From the pictures I've seen the colors are atrocious and I can certainly understand why current tennants are upset.  I'll probably head over there this weekend to take a look at what all the hubbub is about -- maybe snap a few shots myself.  I think the marketing is pretty sharp though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">carl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:30:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243931</link><description>FYI, those last four comments are all from the same IP address and have fishy e-mail addresses so I'm skeptical that Dinzr/artsypoopsy/Felix isn't a 'Gintz-head' or associated with their marketing/sales department :).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mattgoyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:12:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243930</link><description>and no, I'm not a Gintz-head.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:08:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243929</link><description>Randy, just because a person's name is mentioned in an article doesn't mean they are guilty.  Whether or not Gintz is a scam artist can not be deduced from your linked article.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Felix</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:06:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243928</link><description>The condo takes risks stylistically and definitely won't blend in. I wish the style of the interiors would have been better translated to the exterior, but whatever.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">artsypoopsy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:45:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243927</link><description>I haven't seen the condo in person, but the marketing -- print materials and website kick ass.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DzinR</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243926</link><description>When I saw the Vertigo I could not believe how ugly and cheap the building looked.  I was shocked.  So shocked I decided to do some research to figure out what the deal was. A quick search of David Gintz (CEO) of the Gintz Group explains why this building is so ugly.  Based on my search it looks like he is not a developer and is not from Seattle.  Several articles have been printed regarding foreclosure mortgage scams and his involvement.  Here's the articles I found &lt;a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/285940_mortgagescam21.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/285940_mort...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lori Matsukawa of King 5 News did a special story as well that mentioned David Gintz and his involvement in these mortgage scams.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In my opinion, you'd be crazy to buy a condo in that building, especially from that group led by that guy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Randy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:17:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243925</link><description>I just went through the open house.  I think it is too bad that they didn't spend more time and money because really tht building has tons of potential and -- if don't correctly --could be a very cool mid-century modern condo.  Some of the units are really nice, too, in terms of floorplans, views, etc.  Clearly the developer tried to get that mid-century chic thing going, but they just didn't have the aesthetic down correctly (hence the crazy paint on the exterior!).  They put down new wood, bamboo and tile flooring, and the kitchens have the standard wood cabinets and granite counters...but they did not replace any windows, doors, etc. and some of that stuff looks really old.  That would be ok, but it should be priced accordingly.  What the person who commented said about the developing hiding leak problems and earthquake damage is scary, though!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gb</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:46:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243924</link><description>Here's a Live journal entry from someone who used to live in the building: &lt;a href="http://montykins.livejournal.com/234251.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://montykins.livejournal.com/234251.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mattgoyer</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 13:41:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ugliest condo building in Seattle?</title><link>http://www.urbnlivn.com/2006/10/04/ugliest-condo-building-in-seattle/#comment-5243923</link><description>Just an extra piece of information or two:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/287796_tenant06.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/287796_tena...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And their open houses start this weekend (from 11-3).  Should anyone wish to offer feedback in person.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Red</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 18:02:32 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>